Reprinted from David Eby's blog:
Recent data released by the City of Vancouver indicates that market housing growth is far outpacing affordable housing in the DTES. The numbers provide a helpful measure of the change taking place in the neighbourhood, and social housing building overall in Vancouver. Why these numbers aren't more widely available is beyond me.
First, two charts show social housing developments in and outside the DTES, including anticipated timelines. These graphs show approximately 1,557 units over the next 3 to 4 years, suggesting between 400 and 500 new units per year, and well short of the 2,400 units quoted by Coleman in this recent press release and well short of Mayor Sam's absurd claim of more than 3,000 units.

The next graph shows SRO buildings purchased by the province recently, with unit numbers. Anticipated opening dates for buildings not currently in operation are not shown; however, I understand from BC Housing that the renovations will have started on all projects by the Fall.
Of these hotels, all were open and operating except for the Pender, Marr and Rainier hotels, although some were operating at less than full capacity.
Finally, the City is keeping tabs on market housing development in the DTES. This chart shows that 1,597 units have been constructed, are under construction, or are in the final stages of approval for the neighbourhood. This chart does not list the rumoured nine towers that many people in the neighbourhood have heard are under consideration at the City currently.

Finally, the City produced a helpful chart to enable a better understanding of housing trends in the neighbourhood. I apologize for not producing a better version, but this is what I have.
The purple bar reflects non-market housing. The red/burgundy bar shows market housing. The yellowish bar shows SRO/lodging house/residential hotel housing.

A trendline for market housing in the DTES would look like a stock market run in the '80s. A trendline for SRO/lodging house/residential hotel housing would look like a stock market run in the '90s. A trendline for non-market housing would look like a panicked provincial government worried about looking uncaring during the 2010 Olympics, but not really giving much of a crap after that.